LaborNET Workers Online - for the latest labour news online every week
Search   
Home | Ask Neale | Calendar | Links 

  LaborNET Sites

Workers Online
ACTU
NZCTU
Unions NSW
VIC Trades Hall Council
Vic Union Health & Safety Network
Unions WA
UNIONSAFE
Union Teach
Bosswatch
Unions on LaborNET
Evatt Foundation
South Coast Labor Council


  

Union Positions
ORGANISER POSITION – 12 MONTHS FIXED TERM
FIELD ORGANISER
Field Organiser (x5)
Campaign Organisers Melbourne (Casual)
Submit a Job

UNIONSAFE
Latest News
Safety Helpdesk
Shoptalk
Youthsafe

Union Teach
Lesson Plans
Resources
Factsheets
Glossary
Feedback
Links

IR Resources
IR Commissions
IR Departments
Legal Resources

LaborNET Calendar

APHEDA: Union Aid Abroad
Latest News
Current Campaigns

Websites for Unions
Organising Online
Publish your own content

Chifley Financial Services
Home Loans
Financial Planning
Insurance

Union Shopper

 

The Family Unfriendly Government

Date: 19 April 2000

Statement by opposition Leader Kim Beazley

Since its inception, the Howard Government has dealt harshly with Australian families, and no cobbled together $240 million package will fool people into believing otherwise.

Yesterday, the Minister for Family and Community Services, Senator Newman, denied that the Howard Government had cut $5 billion from social programs.

The attached summary confirms that Senator Newman is wrong, and details the areas in which this Government cut funding for family-related expenditure in each of its Budgets.

If Senator Newman still thinks the attached figures are wrong, she should immediately alert the Treasurer to errors in his Budget Papers.

Senator Newman has also tried to defend the Howard Government's miserable record on child care funding, but again she flies in the face of the facts. As the attached graph drawn from the Budget Papers shows, the child care funding announced at the weekend is miniscule compared with the massive cuts previously imposed by this Government.

The announcement on the weekend of a $65 million program for "flexibility and choice in child care" is laughable, and an insult to working mothers and fathers trying to deal with the demands of modern working life and families.

The $65 million over four years represents a little over 1.6 per cent of the total Commonwealth expenditure on child care.

The Government's glossy and expensive puff material says that under this initiative "families will now be able to have their children cared for in their home by a trained child care worker." According to the Government, this will be available to shift workers, families who have a sick child, and families who live in rural and regional Australia.

Shift workers alone represent around 1 million Australian workers. If you assume conservatively that only half of these workers have children, the Government's big child care bonus works out at around $32 per family per year.

This is a complete farce, and shows yet again that this Government is more interested in cheap headlines than in serious policies for all Australians. Mr Howard's recently acquired family friendly clothes are looking completely threadbare.

CANBERRA
18 April 2000

For further information

Contact: Kim Beazley
Union: ALP Federal
WWW: http://www.alp.org.au


Live news Feed
Current Stories | Yearly Archive | Organisation Indexes | Topic Index
Privacy | Disclaimer | Sitemap |Feedback | Links  
© 1997-2002 LaborNET is a resource for the labour movement
provided by the Labor Council of NSW
10th Floor, 377-383 Sussex Street, Sydney NSW 2000
Ph: (02) 9264 1691 Fax: (02) 9261 3505

http://www.labor.net.au/news/154.html
Last Modified: Tuesday, 15-Nov-2005 18:34:41 EST

LaborNET is proudly created, designed and programmed
by Social Change Online for the Labor Council of NSW
[Credits] [Site Matters]

Workers OnlineLabor Council of NSWLaborNET
Powered by APT Solutions